Editorial standard

Methodology

The review separates direct evidence, bounded observations, documented mechanics, and interpretation. Each analysis states both what the cited material establishes and what it does not.

Evidence rules

Each factual statement identifies the sources that support it, with relevant code excerpts shown inline where available.
Code links use pinned commits whenever available; short excerpts never replace the original.
Projections are not described as completed results.
Closed-source findings are limited to published claims and observed interfaces.
Absence findings name their reviewed scope and date and are documented in the wallet implementation review.
Grid, Connect, Spark, Sparkcore, SSPs, Operators, and the Spark Entity are treated as distinct components.
Exit mechanics and economics use Blink's cited public mainnet case study.
Published conclusions rely only on the cited public records and reproducible artifact results listed on this site.

Source types

Pinned source code, public schemas, official documentation, contracts, regulator records, public transaction data, product observations, public posts, and archived first-party material are labeled separately.

Corrections

Later contradictory evidence narrows or corrects a finding rather than being silently omitted.