spark.exposed

Identity, metadata, and public visibility

Privacy

What Operators, the default SSP, public interfaces, and counterparties can learn from the reviewed transfer and payment paths.

How to read this topic: 3 principal evidence groups organize 13 supporting records by the question they answer.

Critical boundary: Visibility is not proof that records were combined or misused. Privacy mode limits covered public reads, while Operator- and SSP-side data flows remain separate questions.

Evidence group 01

What every Operator receives

Reviewed transfer and Lightning paths give every Operator wallet pseudonyms and transaction metadata needed for validation, including full Lightning invoices in the cited flow.

Scope boundary: Pseudonyms are not civil identities by themselves. The record does not establish retention periods, staff access, or that one Operator holds all threshold secrets.

Evidence group 02

Linkability across public and hosted-service paths

Public participant rules, Sparkscan observations, and SSP data models create documented ways to correlate transfers, invoices, destinations, and Operator-layer wallet identities.

Scope boundary: Joinability is not proof that every dataset is combined or misused. Privacy mode can suppress covered public reads when all relevant participants are private.

Evidence group 03

Explicitly public modes and ledgers

Public-mode Bitcoin identities expose holdings and transaction material, while Spark's token ledger is designed for global enumeration under the reviewed interface.

Scope boundary: These are documented public surfaces. They do not expose private keys, and the token-ledger result should not be generalized to privacy-enabled Bitcoin transfers.